Table 2 Studies using MCDM techniques in urban heritage conservation projects
Article | Topic theme/category | MCDM methods employed | Focus of the paper |
|---|---|---|---|
Berta, Bottero, and Ferretti (2016) | Mixed-method approach for the integration of urban design and economic evaluation | Analytic network process (ANP), multi-attribute value theory (MAVT) | Selection of the best masterplan option |
Chen, Yoo, and Hwang (2017) | Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (FMCDM) assessment of urban conservation in historic districts | Fuzzy AHP, fuzzy simple additive weighting (SAW) | Using an FMCDM model to assess a property-led urban conservation project’s success, various stakeholders’ worries and problematic factors may be quantified without the investigator’s subjective influence. Interdependence among the criteria is not assessed. |
Yau 2009 | MCDM for urban-built heritage conservation | AHP | Based on the selection of the best project outcome for a project selection process |
Munarim and Ghisi (2016) | Heritage building rehabilitation | Computer simulation and life cycle assessment tools | The method is used to assess buildings’ environmental performance and for decision-making in rehabilitation projects. |