Skip to main content

The Values and Significance of the Colonial Steel Railway Bridges of Pakistan

Abstract

This paper proposes that Civil Engineering Heritage is a distinct form of heritage, related to but differing from Industrial Heritage and a separate field that should be treated independently. The critical element that signifies engineering heritage is ingenium or innovation in development of complex technological responses to physical challenges. Engineering heritage requires specific approaches to its identification, documentation, conservation and management. The important first step of this process is a clear understanding of the values and attributes that contribute to the significance of engineering heritage and must be safeguarded. The example of engineering heritage examined here is the colonial steel railway bridges of Pakistan; three case study bridges are presented and the values and attributes of each are discussed. The paper then identifies a set of shared essential values of this type of engineering heritage that can serve as a basis for value-based conservation and management.

References

  1. Australia ICOMOS. 2013. The Burra Charter: The Australian ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Signifi-cance. Burwood: Australia ICOMOS.

    Google Scholar 

  2. De La Torre, M., ed. 2002. Assessing the Values of Cultural Heritage. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baloch, G. M. 2017. “Civil Engineering Heritage: The Colonial Steel Railway Bridges of Pakistan.” Unpublished PhD. diss., National College of Arts.

  4. Bell, H. 1894. Railway Policy of India: With Map of Indian Railway System. Rivington: Percical & Co. India.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coulls, A. 1999. Railways as World Heritage Sites. Rome: ICOMOS.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cox, R. and Gould, M. H. 1998. Civil Engineering Heritage: Ireland. London: Thomas Telford Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Engineering Heritage Australia. 2009. Engineering Heritage and Conservation Guidelines. Barton: Engineers Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Engineers Australia Innovation Taskforce. 2012. Innovation in Engineering. Melbourne: Engineers Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  9. HAER (Historic American Engineering Record). n.d. HAER No. AZ–57: London Bridge. Washington: HAER.

  10. Historic England. 2011. Designation Listing Selection Guide: Transport Buildings. London: Historic England.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hurd, J. and I. J. Kerr. 2012. India’s Railway History: A Research Handbook. London: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  12. ICOMOS. 2005. Xi’an Declaration on the Conservation of the Setting of Heritage Sites, Structures and Areas. https://www.icomos.org/xian2005/xian-declaration.htm

  13. ICOMOS. 2011. Joint ICOMOS – TICCIH Principles for Conservation of Industrial Heritage sites, Structures, Areas and Landscapes, The Dublin Principles. Paris: ICOMOS. http://www.icomos.org/Paris2011/GA2011_ICOMOS_TICCIH_joint_principles_EN_FR_final_20120110.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  14. Indus Valley State Railway. 1879. Administrative Report on the Construction of the Railway from Its Commencement to the Close of the Financial Year 1878–1879. Roorkee, India: Thomson Civil Engineering College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kerr, I. 1995. Building the Railway of the Raj, 1850–1900. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. McKeel, W. T., A. B. Miller, K. S. Clark, R.W. Saufley, W. H. Bushman, and T. F. Lester. 2006. “Best practices for Rehabilitation and Moving of the Historical Metal Truss Bridges, Final report Virginia Transportation Research Council.”

  17. Parks Canada. 2010. Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historical Places in Canada. Ottawa: Government of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rennison, R. W. 1996. Civil Engineering Heritage. London: Thomas Telford Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Smith, L. 2006. The Uses of Heritage. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  20. TICCIH. 2003. Nizhny Tagil Charter for Industrial Heritage. http://www.icomos.org/18thapril/2006/nizhny-tagil-charter-e.pdf

  21. TICCIH. 2012. Taipei Declaration for Asian Industrial Heritage. http://ticcih.org/about/charter/taipei-declaration-for-asian-industrial-heritage/

  22. UNESCO. 2013. Managing Cultural World Heritage. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayesha Pamela Rogers.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rogers, A.P., Baloch, G.M. The Values and Significance of the Colonial Steel Railway Bridges of Pakistan. Built Heritage 1, 11–21 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03545654

Download citation

Keywords

  • civil engineering
  • heritage
  • bridges
  • colonial
  • Pakistan
  • values
  • innovation