Skip to main content

Towards the De-secularisation of Heritage


This paper argues that modern conservation concepts, as portrayed in documents like the Venice Charter, have led to the ‘secularisation’ of built heritage. The term ‘secularisation’ is used to describe the over-emphasis on materiality that has led to it being distanced from people. The main focus of this approach has been on the well-being of the material contents of heritage. The reason for this can be attributed to the fact that conservation philosophy in its formative stages was rooted in the contemporary secular values of the Western world. The paper discusses secularisation and its consequences, resistance to change and its authority or dominance in conservation practice. Despite this dominance and authority, the paper argues that changes which focus on people have happened, particularly, over the last two decades. These changes are characterised as the de-secularisation of heritage. Such changes can also be read as a paradigm shift of moving from the care of heritage to that of pursuing the well-being of both heritage and society as a whole. While providing some sources that can sustain de-secularisation, the paper argues that this shift is a sine qua non for heritage to be meaningful and also to act as a cultural motivator for development.


  • Araoz, Gustavo. 2011. “Preserving Heritage Places under a New Paradigm”, Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development 1(1): 55–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandarin, Francesco, and Ron Van Oers. 2012. The Historic Urban Landscape: Managing Heritage in an Urban Century. West Sussex: Willey-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brandi, Cesare. 2005. Theory of Restoration. Florence: Nardini Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. 2005. Council of Europe Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society (Faro Convention). Accessed May 30 2017.

  • De Caro, Stefano, and Gamini Wijesuriya. 2012. “Engaging Communities: Approaches to Capacity Building.” In Involving Communities in World Heritage Conservation—Concepts and Actions in Asia, edited by UNESCO World Heritage Centre, 48–55. Seoul: ICOMOS-KOREA.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICCROM. 2005. Report on Living Heritage Sites Programme, First Strategy Meeting of 2003 (internal report).

  • ICOMOS. 1964. International Charter for The Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (The Venice Charter 1964). Accessed May 30 2016.

  • ICOMOS. 1990. “ICOMOS, A Quarter of A Century, Achievements and Future prospects”. 9th ICOMOS General Assembly and International Symposium. Symposium papers. The Swiss National Committee of ICOMOS, Bern. Accessed May 30 2017.,_9th.html

  • ICOMOS 1994. The Nara Document on Authenticity. Accessed May 30 2017.

  • JAPAN ICOMOS 2004. Nara+20: On Heritage Practices, Cultural Values, and the Concept of Authenticity. Accessed May 30 2017.

  • Jokilehto, Jukka. 2015. “Conservation Ethics from Riegl’s Time to the Present”. Модерна Конзервација [Modern Conservation], 50: 1965–2015 (3): 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, Knute, and Nils Marstein, eds. 1994. Conference on Authenticity in Relation to the World Heritage Convention: Preparatory Workshop. Bergen: Tapir Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, William, and Gamini Wijesuriya. 2015. “New Heritage Studies and Education, Training, and Capacity-Building”. In A Companion to Heritage Studies, edited by William Logan, Máiréad Nic Craith, and Ullrich Kockel, 557–573. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, John. 1923. Conservation Manual. Calcutta: Superintendent Government Printing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndoro, Webber, and Pascal Taruvinga. 2003. “The Vandalism of Domboshava Rock Painting Site, Zimbabwe—Some Reflections on Approaches to Heriateg Managemnt”. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 6: 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ndoro, Webber, and Gamini Wijesuriya. 2015. “Heritage Management and Conservation: From Colonization to Globalization”. In Global Heritage: A Reader, edited by Lynn Meskel, 131–149. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paranavitana, Senarath. 1947. Protection of Monuments Other Than Those on Crown Land. Colombo: Department of Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Recommendations of the Madrid Conference in 1904”. 1904. The Architectural Journal (Being the Journal of the Royal Institute of British Architects) 11: 343–346. Accessed March 27 2017.

  • Tomaszewski, Andrzej. 2007. “Conservation: Its Future as Discipline and Its Theory”. In Cultural Heritage in the 21st Century: Opportunities and Challenges, edited by M.A. Murzyn and J. Purchla, 163–170. Krakow: International Cultural Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, Roland. 1994. “The Significance of the Venice International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites, with Special Reference to Eastern Countries”. ICOMOS Scientific Journal (The Venice Charter - La Charte de Venise 1964–1994): 40–44.

  • Silva, Roland. 1983. “The Significance of the International Venice Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites with Special Reference to Eastern Countries”. In First International Congress on Architectural Conservation, Basle, Ancient Ceylon, 35.

  • UNESCO. 1976. Recommendation Concerning the Safeguarding and Contemporary Role of Historic Areas. Accessed May 30 2017.

  • UNESCO. 2011. Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape. Accessed May 30 2017.

  • UNESCO. 2012. Kyoto Vision. Accessed May 30 2017.

  • UNESCO. 2013. State of Conservation of World Heritage Properties Inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger WHC-13/37.COM/7A. Accessed May 30 2017.

  • UNESCO 2015. Policy for the Integration of a Sustainable Development Perspective into the Processes of the World Heritage Convention. Accessed May 30 2017.

  • UNESCO, ICOMOS, ICCROM. 2010. Preparing World Heritage Nominations. 1st ed. Paris: UNESCO Publication (PDF Version).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO, ICOMOS, ICCROM. 2011. Preparing World Heritage Nominations. 2nd ed. Paris: UNESCO Publication. accessed 30 June 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijesuriya, Gamini, Jane Thompson, and Christopher Young. 2013. UNESCO, ICOMOS, ICCROM Resource Manual on Managing Cultural World Heritage. Paris: UNESCO Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijesuriya, Gamini, Jane Thompson, and Sarah Court. 2017. “People–centred Approaches: Engaging Communities and Developing Capacities for Managing Heritage”. In Heritage, Conservation and Communities: Engagement, Participation and Capacity Building, edited by G. Chitty, 34–50. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijesuriya, Gamini. 2000. “Conserving the Temple of the Tooth Relic, Sri Lanka.” Public Archaeology 1(2): 99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijesuriya, Gamini. 2005. “Past Is in the Present: Perspectives in Caring for Buddhist Heritage Sites in Sri Lanka.” In Conservation of Living Religious Heritage edited by Stovel, Herb, Nicholas Stanley-Price, and Robert Killick, 31–43. Rome: ICCROM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijesuriya, Gamini. 2010. “Conservation in Context.” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Conservation and Preservation—Interaction between Theory and Practice, in Memoriam Alois Riegl (1858–1905), edited by Falser, S. Michael, Wilfried Lipp, and Andrzej Tomaszewski, 233–248. Florence: Edizioni Polistampa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijesuriya, Gamini. 2015. “Living Heritage: A Summary”. Accessed May 30 2017.

  • Wijesuriya, Gamini. 2016a. “From Venice Charter to Nara+20: Beyond Heritage Secularization.” Paper presented at the International Symposium on the Conservation of Brick Monuments at World Heritage Sites, Ayutthaya, October 19–21.

  • Wijesuriya, Gamini. 2016b. “Global Trends in Human Resources Development in Protection of Cultural Heritage”. Paper presented at International Conference on Human Resources Development, Nara, Japan.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gamini Wijesuriya.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wijesuriya, G. Towards the De-secularisation of Heritage. Built Heritage 1, 1–15 (2017).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: