Skip to main content

Volume 2 Supplement 4

Historic Urban Landscape: An Approach to Rethinking Urban Heritage

Conceptualising Intangible Heritage in Urban Environments: Challenges for Implementing the HUL Recommendation


The Historic Urban Landscape (HUL) Recommendation (UNESCO 2011) suggests that heritage management should be holistic, integrated, people-centred and focused on sustainable development goals. Both tangible and intangible heritage should be taken into account, allowing for appropriate change over time. A variety of stakeholders should be involved in planning processes, including all levels of government, NGOs and communities. Intercultural dialogue and mediation, as well as tools such as documentation, inventorying and mapping should be used to identify multiple layers of heritage. Implementing the Recommendation thus offers a wonderful opportunity to develop consultative, bottom-up, integrated planning for sustainable development in urban areas. This paper suggests that one barrier to integrating management planning for tangible and intangible heritage is a persistent confusion about what ‘intangible heritage’ is and why it deserves protection. Is it the values that local communities associate with their environment (‘intangible values’), or is it cultural practices that they happen to perform in that environment (intangible cultural heritage, or ICH)? Should ‘intangible heritage’ be managed as an attribute attesting to the authenticity of tangible fabric, or as a subject of safeguarding in its own right? If it means all these things at the same time, why is the same concept being used for so many different ideas and what are the consequences? The paper will suggest that a clearer conceptual understanding of intangible heritage is necessary to effectively integrate it into urban management strategies under the HUL approach.


  • Angrisano, Mariarosaria, Paolo Franco Biancamano, Martina Bosone, Paola Carone, Gaia Daldanise, Fortuna De Rosa, Alfredo Franciosa et al. 2016. “Towards operationalizing UNESCO Recommendations on ‘Historic Urban Landscape’: A Position Paper.” Aestimum 69: 165–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australia ICOMOS. 1999. The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance. Burwood: Deakin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beardslee, Thomas. 2016. “Whom Does Heritage Empower, and Whom Does It Silence? Intangible Cultural Heritage at the Jemaa el Fnaa, Marrakech.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 22 (2): 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, Janet. 2008. “UNESCO’s 2003 Convention on Intangible Cultural Heritage: The Implications of Community Involvement in ‘Safeguarding.’” In Intangible Heritage edited by Smith, Laurajane and Natsuko Akagawa, 59–87. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Ballarat. 2017. Our People, Culture and Place: A Plan to Sustain Ballarat’s Heritage 2017–2030. Ballarat: City of Ballarat.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Ballarat. 2018a. “Ballarat SongWays Music Mapping.” Accessed December 20 2018.

  • City of Ballarat. 2018b. “SongWays Stories.” Accessed December 20 2018.

  • City of Ballarat. 2018c. “Ballarat Heritage Database.” Accessed December 20 2018.

  • City of Ballarat. 2018d. “Heritage Grants and Loans.” Accessed December 20 2018. http://www.ballarat.vic.govau/sh/heritage/heritage-grants-and-loans.aspx

  • Clark, Kate. 2001. Informed Conservation: Understanding Historic Buildings and Their Landscapes for Conservation. London: English Heritage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, Harriet, and Smeets, Rieks. 2013. “Authenticity, Value and Community Involvement in Heritage Management under the World Heritage and Intangible Heritage Conventions.” Heritage and Society 6 (2): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICOMOS 2005. “Xi’an Declaration on the Conservation of the Setting of Heritage Structures, Sites and Areas.” Accessed 20 December 2018.

  • ICOMOS 2008. “Québec Declaration on the Preservation of the Spirit of Place.” Accessed 20 December 2018.

  • Jigyasu, Rohit. 2015. “The Intangible Dimension of Urban Heritage.” In Reconnecting the City: The Historic Urban Landscape Approach and the Future of Urban Heritage, edited by Bandarin, Francesco and Ron van Oers, 129–144. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Jokilehto, Jukka. 2006. “Considerations on Authenticity and Integrity in World Heritage Context.” City & Time 2 (1):1–14.

  • Labadi, Sophia. 2013. UNESCO, Cultural Heritage, and Outstanding Universal Value: Value-Based Analyses of the World Heritage and Intangible Cultural Heritage Conventions. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morocco. 2014. “Report on the Implementation of the Convention and on the Status of Elements Inscribed on the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity.” Submitted to Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, 9th session, UNESCO Headquarters, 24–28 November 2014.

  • Munjeri, Dawson. 2008. “Following the Length and Breadth of the Roots: Some Dimensions of Intangible Heritage.” In Intangible Heritage, edited by Laurajane Smith and Natsuko Akagawa, 145–164. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeets, Rieks and Harriet Deacon. 2017. “The Examination of Nomination Files Under the UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Heritage.” In The Routledge Companion to Intangible Heritage, edited by Michelle Stefano and Peter Davis, 12–22. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Laurajane. 2006. Uses of Heritage. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stovel, Herb. 2007. “Effective Use of Authenticity and Integrity as World Heritage Qualifying Conditions.” City & Time 2 (3): 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tebbaa, Ouidad. 2010. “The Heritage of the Jemaa El Fna Square in Marrakech: Between The Material and The Immaterial.” [Le patrimoine de la place Jemaa El Fna de Marrakech: entre le matériel et l’immatériel.] Quaderns de la Mediterrània 13: 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO 1972. “Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage.” Accessed 20 December 2018.

  • UNESCO 1976. “Nairobi Recommendation Concerning the Safeguarding and Contemporary Role of Historic Areas.” Accessed 20 December 2018.

  • UNESCO 2003. “Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage.” Accessed 20 December 2018.

  • UNESCO 2005. “Vienna Memorandum on World Heritage and Contemporary Architecture – Managing the Historic Urban Landscape.” Accessed 20 December 2018.

  • UNESCO 2010. “Adoption of Retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value.” WHC-10/34.COM/8E.Add. Accessed 20 December 2018.

  • UNESCO 2011. “Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape.” Accessed 20 December 2018.

  • UNESCO 2017. “Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention.” Accessed 20 December 2018.

  • UNESCO 2018. “Operational Directives for the Implementation of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage.” Accessed 20 December 2018.

  • UNESCO. 2018. “World Heritage Centre: UNESCO Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape.” Accessed December 20 2018.

  • United Nations. 2015. “Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.” Accessed 20 December 2018.

  • United Nations. 2016. “New Urban Agenda: Quito Declaration on Sustainable Cities and Human Settlements for All.” Accessed 20 December 2018.

  • Van Oers, Ron, 2010. “Managing Cities and the Historic Urban Landscape Initiative—An Introduction.” In Managing Historic Cities: World Heritage Papers 37, edited by Ron van Oers and Sachiko Haraguchi, 7–17. Paris: UNESCO World Heritage Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHITRAP (World Heritage Institute of Training and Research for the Asia and the Pacific Region under the auspices of UNESCO). 2016. The HUL Guidebook: Managing Heritage in Dynamic and Constantly Changing Urban Environments. UNESCO: Paris.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harriet Jane Deacon.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deacon, H.J. Conceptualising Intangible Heritage in Urban Environments: Challenges for Implementing the HUL Recommendation. Built Heritage 2, 72–81 (2018).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: