Skip to main content

Modern Built Heritage Conservation Policies: How to Keep Authenticity and Emotion in the Age of Digital Culture

Abstract

The Modern Movement has demonstrated its long-term legitimacy as a lasting concept endowed with longevity. Relating technology, spatial form and social commitment to one another, through an optimistic faith in progress, modern architects sought to attain new heights of functionality and flexibility in use. The current challenge is to find ways to deal with the conservation of this recent legacy in the continuously changing context of current times, including physical, economic, functional, and fast-moving socio-cultural and political values. To address these questions, ‘Modern built heritage conservation policies’ explores the restoration and renovation processes undertaken in some paradigmatic case studies: the Tugendhat House (Mies van der Rohe and Lilly Reich, Brno, Czech Republic, 1929–1930), the Crown Hall (Mies van der Rohe, Chicago, USA, 1950–1956), the National Museum of Western Art (Le Corbusier, Tokyo, Japan, 1959) and the Gulbenkian Foundation (Alberto Pessoa, Pedro Cid e Ruy d’Athouguia, Lisbon, Portugal, 1959–1969).

References

  1. Abdelmonem, Mohamed Gamal. 2017. “Architectural and Urban Heritage in the Digital Age: Dilemmas of Authenticity, Originality and Reproduction.” International Journal of Architectural Research 11 (3): 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Banham, Reyner. 1960. Theory and Design in the First Machine Age. London: The Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benjamin Walter. 1935. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” In Illuminations. Walter Benjamin. Essays and Reflections, edited by Hannah Arendt, 1968. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Castells Manuel. 1999. The Information Age, Volumes 1–3: Economy, Society and Culture. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Castells, Manuel. 2009. Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cesare, Brandi. 2005. Theory of Restoration. Florence: Nardini Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Damásio, António. 2003. Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow and the Feeling Brain. London: William Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Graf, Franz, and Giulia Marino. 2011. “Modern and Green: Heritage, Energy, Economy.” Docomomo Journal 44.

  10. F Graf (2012) Material History and Conservation of Contemporary Building Fabric R Carvais A Guillerme V Nègre J Sakarovitvh (Eds) Nuts & Bolts of Construction History, Culture, Technology and Society Vol. I Picard Paris 135–142

    Google Scholar 

  11. Graf, Franz. 2012. “Material History and Conservation of Contemporary Building Fabric.” In Nuts & Bolts of Construction History, Culture, Technology and Society Vol. I, edited by Robert Carvais, André Guillerme, Valérie Nègre, Joel Sakarovitvh, 135–142. Paris: Picard.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Graf, Franz. 2014. Histoire matérielle du bâti et projet de sauvegarde. Devenir de l’architecture moderne et contemporaine [Material History of the Building and Project of Safeguard: Become a Modern and Contemporary Architecture]. Lausanne: Presses Polytechniques Universitaires Romandes.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grignolo, Roberta, ed. 2013. Diritto e salvaguardia dell’architettura del XX secolo [Law and the Preservation of 20th Century Architecture]. Mendrisio: Mendrisio Academy Press-Silvana Editoriale, Mendrisio-Cinisello Balsamo

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gropius, Walter. 1955. Scope of Total Architecture. New York: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hammer, Ivo. 2014. “Surface is Interface: History of the Tugendhat House 1938–1997. Criteria for the Preservation.” In Haus Tugendhat. Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, edited by Daniela Hammer-Tugendhat, Ivo Hammer, and Wolf Tegethoff, 149–154. Basel: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hammer, Ivo. 2014. “Materiality. History of the Tugendhat House 1997–2012. Conservation-science Study and Restoration.” In Haus Tugendhat. Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, edited by Daniela Hammer-Tugendhat, Ivo Hammer, and Wolf Tegethoff, 162–223. Basel: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Harboe, Gunny. 2000. S.R. Crown Hall Historic Structure Report. Chicago: McClier Preservation Group.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Harrington, Kevin. 1993. “S.R. Crown Hall.” In AIA guide to Chicago, edited by Alice Sinkevitch and Laurie McGovern Petersen, 388–389. San Diego: Harcourt Brace & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Henket, Hubert-Jan, and Wessel de Jonge. 2010. “A Restoration Concept for Modern Movement Architecture.” In Sanatorium Zonnestraal: The History and Restoration of a Modern Monument, edited by Paul Meurs and Marie-Thérèse van Thoor, 98–101. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nicholson, Ben. 2018. “S.R. Crown Hall.” Accessed June 15 2018. http://miessociety.org/mies/projects/s-r-crown-hall.

  21. Nunes, Teresa. 2013. “Descriptive report of the project.” In Restauro e Renovação do Grande Auditório, edited by Ana Tostões. Lisboa: FCG

    Google Scholar 

  22. Okada, Tsuneo. 2009. “Seismic Retrofitting for The Main Building of the National Museum of Western Art.” In Le Corbusier & the National Museum of Western Art. Tokyo: Open Museum/The Western Art Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Prudon, Theodore. 2008. Preservation of Modern Architecture. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Prudon, Theodore. 2010. “The ‘Modern’ Challenge to Preservation.” Forum Journal 24 (4): 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Reichlin, Bruno. 2001. “Quelle histoire pour la sauveguarde du patrimoine architectural moderne et contemporain?” [What History for the Safeguarding of the Modern and Contemporary Architectural Heritage?] Patrimoine et Architecture 10–11: 50–57.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Riegl, Aloïs. 1982. “The Modern Cult of Monuments: Its Character and Its Origin.” Oppositions 25: 21–51.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ruskin, John. 1851–1853. The Stones of Venice. 3 vols., London: Smith, Elder & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ruskin, John. 1860. The Seven Lamps of Architecture. London: Smith, Elder.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sexton, Mark. 2014. “Restoration of Crown Hall.” In Proceedings of the 13th Docomomo International Conference Seoul – Expansion & Conflict, edited by Ana Tostões, Jong Soung Kimm and Tae-woo Kim. Seoul: Docomomo Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sexton, Mark. 2017. “Restoration of Crown Hall.” Docomomo Journal 56: 64–71.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Smith, Laurajane. 2006. Uses of Heritage. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Stein, Carl. 2010. Greening Modernism: Preservation, Sustainability, and the Modern Movement. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tomás, Osório. 2012. “Relatório.” In Restauro e Renovação do Grande Auditório, edited by Ana Tostões. Lisboa: FCG.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tomlow, Jos, and Ola Wedebrunn, eds. 2006. Docomomo Preservation Technology Dossier 9: Climate and Building Physics in the Modern Movement. Paris: Docomomo International.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tostões, Ana and Kecheng Liu, eds. 2014. Docomomo International 1988–2012: Key Papers in Modern Architectural Heritage Conservation. Beijing: China Architectural and Building Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tostões, Ana and Zara Ferreira, eds. 2016. Adaptive Reuse: The Modern Movement towards the Future. Lisboa: Docomomo International/Casa da Arquitectura.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tostões, Ana, and Aurora Carapinha. 2016. “The Creation of an Urban Landscape.” In Adaptive Reuse: The Modern Movement towards the Future, edited by Ana Tostões, and Zara Ferreira. Lisboa: Docomomo International/Casa da Arquitectura.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tostões, Ana, Ivo Hammer, and Zara Ferreira. 2017. “The Re-birth of the Tugendhat House.” Docomomo Journal 56: 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tostões, Ana, ed. 2011. Docomomo Journal, n. 44 – Modern and Sustainable, Barcelona, Docomomo International, 2011.

  40. Tostões, Ana. 2012. The Buildings, Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation. Lisboa: FCG.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tostões, Ana. 2015a. Restauro e Renovação do Grande Auditório. Lisboa: FCG.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Tostões, Ana. 2015b. “Towards a New Monumentality: The Creation of an Urban Cultural Landscape.” Journal of Architectural and Town-Planning Theory 49 (3–4): 240–257.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tostões, Ana. 2015c “Learning from an Outstanding Process. The Gulbenkian Foundation Buildings (1959–1969).” In Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress on Construction History, edited by Bowen, B., Friedman, D., Leslie, T., and Oschendorf, J. Chicago: Construction History Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  44. UNESCO. 2018. “Tugendhat Villa in Brnohttp.” UNESCO World Heritage Centre. June 15 2018. http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1052

  45. Yamana, Yoshiyuki, and Kyo Fukuda. 2016. “National Museum of Western Art as Important Cultural Property of Japan: its Evolution and Historical Value.” Docomomo Journal 53.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Tostões.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tostões, A. Modern Built Heritage Conservation Policies: How to Keep Authenticity and Emotion in the Age of Digital Culture. Built Heritage 2, 17–34 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03545691

Download citation

Keywords

  • restoration
  • renovation
  • conservation
  • Modern Movement architecture
  • authenticity
  • materiality
  • adaptive reuse