Skip to main content

Repercussions of Singularity of Site Authorities in Making Heritage Conservation Decisions: Evidence from Iraq

Abstract

Different global assertions have recently been made prohibiting the mono approach of decision-makers in formulating heritage conservation policies, due to many unfavourable touristic and political implications. The mono approach has led to exploitation of some sites’ cultural standing as well as condoning a veritable remedy of some of their social and urban aspects, and thus threatening these sites with exclusion from the World Heritage List. This paper investigates the approach of some local Iraqi experiences of conservation, aiming at revealing some of the more painful repercussions of the singularity of site authorities in planning for built heritage future, which may draw a plan for the site away from its heritage potential. Some local cases are reviewed here, such as Erbil Citadel, setting them as examples that may add more facts to the global experience of heritage conservation in this regard. The paper concludes that the site authorities are also liable to drift as a result of some ramifications that impede setting a deep-sighted strategy, and thus may stray far from delivering the far-reaching aims. Accordingly, the monaural authority approach may need to be synthesised with some of the site’s locally-based views through an overlapped integral loop of interactions between them, which may support the conservation policy-formulation with diverse contributions.

References

  1. Allen, Jeff. 2013. “The Renovation Project of the Ancient City of Babylon in Iraq and Returned to the World Heritage List.” Middle-east, Arabs’ International Newspaper, August 23.

  2. Aljanabi, Hassan. 1987. Erbil City: An Urban Study. Mosul: University of Mosul Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Avrami, Erica, Randall Mason, and Marta de la Torre. 2000. Values and Heritage Conservation: Research Report. The Getty Conservation Institute: Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brammah, Huszar. 2009a. “Revitalisation of Erbil Citadel-Iraq-Phase I, Final Report: Summary of Activities and Outputs of the Project.”

  5. Brammah, Huszar. 2009b. “Revitalisation of Erbil Citadel -Iraq-, Phase I, Final Report: Implementation Action Plan.”

  6. Brammah, Michael. 2009. “Workshop on the Future of Erbil Citadel: A Vision for the Future of the Citadel.”

  7. Carlsson, Lars, and Fikret Berkes. 2005. “Co-management: Concepts and Methodological Implications.” Journal of Environmental Management 75 (1): 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chapman, Ellen. 2008. “Community, Heritage, Identity: Constructing, Performing and Consuming Welsh Identities in the US.” PhD diss., Newcastle University.

  9. Chitty, Gill, ed. 2017. Heritage, Conservation and Communities: Engagement, Participation and Capacity. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Damon, Arwa. 2013. Bringing Babylon back from the Dead. CNN, April 5. Accessed August 24 2015. https://edition.cnn.com/2013/04/04/world/meast/iraq-babylon-tourism/index.html

  11. Ebraheem, Sharameen. 2013. “The Impact of Architectural Identity on National Branding: The Case Study of Iraqi Kurdistan.” PhD diss., Manchester Metropolitan University.

  12. Hampton, Mark. P. 2005. “Heritage, Local Communities and Economic Development.” Annals of Tourism Research 32 (3): 735–759.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hardoy, Jorge, E., and Margarita Gutman. 1991. “The Role of Municipal Government in the Protection of Historic Centres in Latin American Cities.” Environment and Urbanisation 3 (1): 96–108.

    Google Scholar 

  14. HCECR (High Commission for Erbil Citadel Revitali-sation). 2012a. “Erbil Citadel: Reinstatement of the Grand Gate.”

  15. HCECR (High Commission for Erbil Citadel Revitalisation). 2012b. “Highlights of Erbil Citadel: History and Architecture: Visitor Guide.”

  16. HCECR (High Commission for Erbil Citadel Revitalisation). 2012c. “Nomination of Erbil Citadel (Kurdistan Region, Iraq) for Inscription on the UNESCO World Heritage List; Vol. I.”

  17. Hewiston, Robert. 1987. The Heritage Industry: Britain in a Climate of Decline. London: Metheun.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hidaka, Lucia, Tone, Ferreira. 2008. “Contemporary Theory of Conservation, by Salvador Muñoz Viñas.” City & Time, 4 (1): 65–68.

    Google Scholar 

  19. ICOMOS. 1999. The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance.

  20. ICOMOS. 2008. Quebec Declaration on the Preservation of the Spirit of the Place.

  21. ICOMOS. 2013a. The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance, 2013.

  22. ICOMOS. 2013b. Understanding and Assessing Cultural Significance, Practice Note, Version 1, Australia ICOMOS.

  23. ICOMOS. 2014. “Evaluations of Nominations of Cultural and Mixed Properties: ICOMOS Report for the World Heritage Committee 38th Ordinary Session.” Doha, June 2014.

  24. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature). 1996. The World Conservation Union: Special Issue on Collaboration Management, No. 2.

  25. Ismail, Ayoob, and Ibrahim Ngah. 2010. “Urban Planning for Small and Medium Cities in Kurdistan Region-Iraq: Problems and Available Opportunities.” International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology 2 (12): 7070–7077.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jasim, Mohammed, Laura Hanks, and Katharina Borsi. 2017. “Do Really the Audience’s Views Efficiently Boost Built Heritage Conservation Policies?” Athens Journal of Tourism 4 (4): 238–306.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jokilehto, Jukka. 2017. “Engaging Conservation: Communities, Place and Capacity Building.” In Conservation and Communities: Engagement, Participation and Capacity, edited by Gill Chitty, 17–33. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jordan, Grant. 1990. “Sub-governments, Policy Communities and Networks, Refilling Old Bottles?” Journal of Theoretical Politics 2 (3): 319–332.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kriken, John, Philip Enquist, and Richard Rapaport. 2010. City Building, Nine Planning Principles for the Twenty-first Century. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Macginnis, J. 2013. “Erbil in the Cuneiform Sources: A Catalogue and Historical Assessment.” Erbil-Iraq, Kurdistan Regional Government.

  31. Monk, Daniel, Bertrand, and Andrew Herscher. 2015. “The New Universalism: Refuges and Refugees between Global History and Voucher Humanitarianism.” Grey Room (61): 71–80.

  32. Muñoz Viñas, Salvador. 2005. Contemporary Theory of Conservation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nicholas, Lorraine, Nadia, Brijesh Thapa, and Yong Jae Ko. N. 2009. “Residents’ Perspectives of a World Heritage Site.” Annals of Tourism Research 36 (3): 390–412.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nooraddin, Hoshiar. 2012. “Architectural Identity in an Era of Change.” Developing Country Studies 2(10): 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Novacek, Karel, Tomas Chabr, David Filipsky, Libor Janicek, Libor Janicek, Karel Pavelka, Petr Šída, Martin Trefny, and Pavel Vareka. 2008. “Research of the Arbil Citadel, Iraqi Kurdistan, First Season.” Pamatky Archeologicke 99: 259–302.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rebwar Ismail Ibrahim, Sabah A. Mushatat, and Mohamed Gamal Abdelmonem. 2015. “Erbil.” Cities 49: 14–25.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rebwar Ismail Ibrahim, Sabah A. Mushatat, and Mohamed Gamal Abdelmonem. 2014. “Authenticity, Identity and Sustainability in Post-war Iraq: Reshaping the Urban Form of Erbil City.” Journal of Islamic Architecture 3 (2): 58–68.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rydin, Yvonne. 2010. Governing for Sustainable Urban Development. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Seymour, Michael. 2014. Babylon: Legend, History and the Ancient City. London: I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Shirshab, Adel. 2015. “Iraq Completed the File for Reraised Babylon to the World Heritage List.” Baghdad: NEWS. http://arabic.news.cn/culture/2015-01/20/c_133931015.htm

  41. Silva, Kapila, D. and Neel Kamal Chapagain, eds. 2013. Asian Heritage Management: Contexts, Concerns, and Prospects. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  42. SOITM (Iraqi Turkmen Human Rights Research Foundation). 2013. Report: Erbil Citadel.

  43. Stansfield, Gareth. 2003. Iraqi Kurdistan: Political Development and Emergent Democracy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Taylor, Ken. 2004. “Cultural Heritage Management: A Possible Role for Charters and Principles in Asia.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 10 (5): 417–433.

    Google Scholar 

  45. The Forum of Monuments within the Antiquities and Heritage Law 2002. No. 55 of 2002. Baghdad; Legal Rule.

  46. The Municipal Administration Law No. 165 of 1964. Baghdad; Legal Rule.

  47. Timothy, Dallen. 1999. “Participatory Planning: A View of Tourism in Indonesia.” Annals of Tourism Research 26 (1): 371–391.

    Google Scholar 

  48. UNESCO 2009. International Coordination Committee for the Safeguarding of the Cultural Heritage of Iraq: Sub-Committee on Babylon: Report on Damage Assessments in Babylon.

  49. UNESCO 2014. Erbil Citadel Conservation Guidelines and Manual for Implementation, prepared by Ms Patrizia Barucco and Ms Lorenza Nicosia.

  50. Uriely, Natan, Aviad Israeli, and Arie Reichel. 2003. “Religious Identity and Residents’ Attitudes toward Heritage Tourism Development: The Case of Nazareth Heritage.” Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research 27 (1), 69–84.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Yasin, Salahaddin. 2011. “Influence of Modernity versus Continuity of Architectural Identity on House Façade in Erbil City” PhD diss., University of Sains Malaysia.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed Awadh Jasim.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jasim, M.A., Hanks, L. & Borsi, K. Repercussions of Singularity of Site Authorities in Making Heritage Conservation Decisions: Evidence from Iraq. Built Heritage 2, 77–91 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03545704

Download citation

Keywords

  • heritage conservation policies
  • heritage decision-makers
  • top-down approach
  • local views
  • Babylon
  • Erbil Citadel