Skip to main content

Negotiating Contestations for Community-Oriented Heritage Management: A Case Study of Loushang in China

Abstract

Rural heritage is a living heritage of significant importance; it requires community-oriented management for cultural continuity and local development. Different social relations exist at rural heritage sites, which lead to external contestation among stakeholders and internal contestation within the community. It is essential to identify the impact caused by such contestations and determine an appropriate way to negotiate solutions. This paper examines the case of Loushang in Guizhou Province, identifying the contestations by examining the social relations through questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Negotiation requires an appropriate person or social group to act as intermediary: they engage the stakeholders and induce them to collaborate; they also empower the community in heritage management. The case of Loushang indicates the tools that are necessary to facilitate community-oriented management for rural heritage; it bridges theoretical research and heritage practice.

References

  1. Baillie, Britt. 2009. Living Heritage Approach Handbook. Rome: ICCROM.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carlarne, John. 2011. “Multi-context Engaged Learning and Ethnographic Fieldwork: Some Notes from the Middle of the Edge.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 14 (2): 135–152.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fei, Xiaotong. 1985. Xiangtu Zhongguo [From the Soil: The Foundations of Chinese Society]. Shanghai: SDX Joint Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Harrison, Rodney. 2013. Heritage: Critical Approaches. Abingdon & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Li, Fengqing, and Jianxin Wang. 2013. “Wenhua yichandi ziyuan guanli zhong liyi xiangguan zhe canyu jiegou guanxi tanxi.” [The Structural Analysis of Stakeholder Participating the Heritage Site Resource Management] Journal of Northwest University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition) 43 (2): 132–136.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Luo, Deyin. 2016. “Rang xiangcun yichan huigui baixing shenghuo.” [Let Rural Heritage Return to People’s Life.] New Architecture, no. 4: 18–22.

  7. Oakes, Tim. 1995. “Tourism in Guizhou: The Legacy of Internal Colonialism.” In Tourism in China: Geographic, Political, and Economic Perspectives, edited by Alan A. Lew and Lawrence Yu, 203–220. Boulder: Westerview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Oakes, Tim. 1997. “Ethnic Tourism in Rural Guizhou: Sense of Place and Commerce of Authenticity.” In Tourism, Ethnicity, and the State in Asian and Pacific Societies, edited by Michel Picard and Robert Wood, 35–70. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Oakes, Tim. 2006. “Cultural Strategies of Development: Implications for Village Governance in China.” The Pacific Review 19 (1): 13–37.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Oakes, Tim. 2009. “Cultural Geography and Chinese Ethnic Tourism.” Journal of Cultural Geography 12 (2): 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Oakes, Tim. 2010. “Dragonheads and Needlework: Textile Work and Cultural Heritage in a Guizhou County.” Provincial China 7 (2): 151–177.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Oakes, Tim. 2013. “Heritage as Improvement: Cultural Display and Contested Governance in Rural China.” Modern China 39 (4): 380–407.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Oakes, Tim. 2016. “Villagizing the City: Turning Rural Ethnic Heritage into Urban Modernity in Southwest China.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 22 (10): 751–765.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Redfield, Robert. 1956. Peasant Society and Culture: An Anthropological Approach to Civilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Riesto, Svava, and Anne Tietjen. 2016. “Doing Heritage Together: New Heritage Frontiers in Collaborative Planning.” In Heritage, Democracy and the Public: Nordic Approaches, edited by Trogrim Sneve Guttormsen and Grete Swensen, 159–174. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sen, Amertya. 2001. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shi, Jizhong. 1990. “Guizhou Hanzu yimin kao.” [Study on Han Migrants in Guizhou.] Guizhou Wenshi Congkan no. 1: 26–33.

  18. Smith, Laurajane. 2006. Uses of Heritage. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stevens, Mary, Andrew Flinn, and Elizabeth Shepherd. 2010. “New Frameworks for Community Engagement in the Archive Sector: From Handing over to Handing on.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 16 (1–2): 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tapp, Nicholas. 2008. “Romanticism in China?—Its Implications for Minority Images and Aspirations.” Asian Studies Review 32 (4): 457–474.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tapp, Nicholas. 2010. “Yunnan: Ethnicity and Economies—Markets and Mobility”. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 11 (2): 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tapp, Nicholas. 2014. “Religious Issues in China’s Rural Development: The Importance of Ethnic Minorities.” The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 15 (5): 433–452.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Urla, Jaqueline, and Justin Helepololei. 2014. “The Ethnography of Resistance Then and Now: On Thickness and Activist Engagement in the Twenty-First Century.” History and Anthropology 25 (4): 431–451.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, Cangbai. 2017. “Heritage as Theatre: Reconceptualizing Heritage-Making in Urban China.” China Information 31 (2): 195–215.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, Zheng. 2016. “Jiyu zhibu lilun de chuantong cunluo baohu fazhan guihua celve yanjiu.” [Traditional Village Protection Development Planning Strategy Based on the Theory of the Weaving Analysis.] Master diss., Beijing University of Technology.

  26. Yan, Haiming. 2012. “World Heritage in China: Universal Discourse and National Culture.” PhD diss., University of Virginia.

  27. Yan, Haiming. 2015. “World Heritage as Discourse: Knowledge, Discipline and Dissonance in Fujian Tulou Sites.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 21 (1): 65–80.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yu, Hua. 2015. “A Vernacular Way of ‘Safeguarding’ Intangible Heritage: The Fall and Rise of Rituals in Gouliang Miao village.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 21 (10): 1016–1035.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang, Changnian, Zhankun Wang, and Wenjie Tang. 2014. “Shaoshu mimzu chuantong tiyu de wenhua xiangzheng yu shehui gongneng tanjiu—yi Gelaozu wu maolong weili.” [Cultural Symbols and Social Functions of Traditional Ethnic Minority Sports: A Case Study of Gelao Long Hair Dragon Dance.] Journal of Nanjing Sport Institute (Social Science) 28 (5): 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhu, Yujie. 2015. “Cultural Effects of Authenticity: Contested Heritage Practices in China.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 21 (6): 594–608.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaomei Zhao.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, X. Negotiating Contestations for Community-Oriented Heritage Management: A Case Study of Loushang in China. Built Heritage 3, 58–71 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03545719

Download citation

Keywords

  • internal contestation
  • external contestation
  • community-oriented heritage management
  • rural heritage