Skip to main content

The Promotion of Building Culture in Rural Germany

Abstract

Over the past two decades, building culture has increasingly caught the attention of the architectural and planning professions. The building culture is to be understood in the broadest sense as the sum of all cultural, economic, technological, social and ecological factors influencing the quality and process of planning and construction. While the revitalisation and promotion of building culture is central to discussions on urban areas, these are generally ignored in regard to rural areas. This article aims to provide an overview of how building culture has been promoted in Germany’s rural areas, thereby contributing to international research on this topic. The paper adopts a general descriptive approach in examining the promotion of building culture in rural Germany. It provides background knowledge on institutional promotion and demonstrates the diverse approaches implemented in representative villages as best practices examples. The German experience confirms that the promotion of building culture is a meaningful and effective measure to help revitalise rural areas. Moreover, the three selected rural municipalities show how stakeholders from civil society are increasingly involved in measures to implement and promote building culture in the local context.

References

  1. Alte Schule Baruth. 2019. “Kunst- und Kulturverein.” Accessed June 24 2019. http://www.alte-schule-baruth.de/

  2. Andrews, Rhys. 2011. “Religious Communities, Immigration and Social Cohesion in Rural Areas: Evidence from England.” Rural Sociology 76 (4): 535–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arnstein, Sherry R. 1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Planning Association 35 (4): 216–224.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baruth/Mark. 2019. “Municipality website.” Accessed June 24 2019. https://www.stadt-baruth-mark.de/

  5. BauGB. 2018. Baugesetzbuch—Federal Building Code BeckTexte im dtv. 50th ed. Munich, Germany.

  6. Baukultur BW. 2018. “Baukultur Baden-Württemberg.” Accessed 24 June 2019. https://www.baukultur-bw.de/

  7. BBR (German Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning), ed. 2001. “Raumentwicklung und Raumordnung in Deutschland—Kurzfassung des Raumordnungsberichts 2000.” Accessed 24 June 2019. https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/Raumentwicklung/RaumentwicklungDeutschland/Raumordnungsberichte/ROB2000/ROB2000Broschuere.pdf

  8. BBSR (Federal Institute for Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Research), ed. 2010a. “Laufende Raumbeobachtung–Raumabgrenzungen. Raumtypen ROB 2010.” Accessed 24 June 2019. https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/Raumbeobachtung/Raumabgrenzungen/deutschland/gemeinden/Raumtypen2010_vbg/raumtypen2010_node.html

  9. BBSR (Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development), ed. 2010b. “Brauchen wir eine neue Förderstruktur für ländliche Räume? Empirische Befunde und Empfehlungen für die Politik. BBSR-Berichte KOMPAKT 5/2010. Bonn, Germany.” Accessed 24 June 2019. https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/Veroeffentlichungen/Berichte-Kompakt/2010/DL_5_2010.pdf

  10. BBSR (Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development). 2016a. “Baukultur konkret.” Accessed 24 June 2019. https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/FP/ExWoSt/Forschungs-felder/2014/BaukulturKonkret/BaukulturKonkret_node.html

  11. BBSR (Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development). 2016b. “Baukultur und Tourismus—Kooperation in der Region.” Accessed 24 June 2019. https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/FP/ExWoSt/Forschungsfelder/2016/baukultur-tourismus/start-node.html

  12. BBSR (Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development), ed. 2017a. “Baukultur Rezepte, BBSR-Sonderveröffentlichung. Bonn, 2017.” Accessed 24 June 2019. https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/Veroeffentlichungen/Sonderveroeffentlichungen/2017/33-baukultur-rezepte-dl.pdf

  13. BBSR (Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development), ed. 2017b. “Wie viel (Re-)Urbanisierung durchzieht das Land? BBSR-Analysen KOMPAKT 07/2017. Bonn, Germany.” Accessed 24 June 2019. https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/Veroeffentlichungen/AnalysenKompakt/2017/ak-07-2017-dl.pdf

  14. BBSR (Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development), ed. 2018a. “Baukultur Konkret, BBSR-Sonderveröffentlichung. Bonn, 2018.” Accessed 24 June 2019. https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/Veroeffentlichungen/Sonderveroeffentlichungen/2018/baukultur-konkret-dl.pdf

  15. BBSR (Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development), ed. 2018b. “Baukulturinitiativen - Zivilgesellschaftliches Engagement für den Ort: Ergebnisse der offenen Werkstatt Baukultur vom 24.” bis 25. Oktober 2017 in Leipzig. BBSR-Sonderveröffentlichung, July 2018. Bonn, Germany. Accessed 24 June 2019. https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/Veroeffentlichungen/Sonderveroeffentlichungen/2018/offene-werkstatt-baukultur-dl.pdf

  16. BBSR (Federal Institute for Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Research). 2019. “Geschichte des BBSR.” Accessed 24 June 2019. https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/Bundesinstitut/Geschichte/geschichte_node.html

  17. BMEL (German Federal Ministry for Food and Agriculture). 2018. “Ländliche Regionen verstehen: Fakten und Hintergründe zum Leben und Arbeiten in ländlichen Regionen.” Accessed 24 June 2019. https://www.bmel.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/Broschueren/LR-verstehen.pdf Access 26/06/2019

  18. BMVBS (German Federal Ministry of Transport, Construction and Urban Development). 2013. “Baukultur in ländlichen Räumen.” Accessed 24 June 2019. https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/Veroeffentlichungen/ministerien/BMVBS/Sonderveroeffentlichungen/2013/DL_BaukulturLaendlicheRaeume.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2

  19. Bogner, Alexander, and Wolfgang Menz. 2009. “The Theory-Generating Expert Interview: Epistemological Interest, Forms of Knowledge, Interaction.” In Interviewing Experts, edited by Alexander Bogner, Beate Littig and Wolfgang Menz, 43–80. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bundesstiftung Baukultur (German Federal Foundation of Building Culture), ed. 2011. “Baukultur ist Partizipationskultur - Netzwerktreffen Süd 29. Juni 2011.” [Building Culture is a Participatory Culture - Network Meeting South June 29, 2011.] Accessed 24 June 2019. https://www.bundesstiftung-baukultur.de/sites/default/files/medien/1/downloads/baukultur_ist_partizipationskultur.pdf

  21. Bundesstiftung Baukultur (German Federal Foundation of Building Culture). 2019. “Homepage of German Federal Foundation for Building Culture.” Accessed 24 June 2019. https://www.bundesstiftung-baukultur.de/en

  22. Crowe, Sarah, Kathrin Cresswell, Ann Robertson, Guro Huby, Anthony Avery, and Aziz Sheikh. 2011 “The Case Study Approach.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 11 (100).

  23. Davis, Howard. 2006. The Culture of Building. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dijkstra, Lewis, and Hugo Poelman. 2014. “A Harmonised Definition of Cities and Rural Areas: The New Degree of Urbanisation.” European Commission Regional Working Paper 2014. Accessed 24 June 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/work/2014_01_new_urban.pdf

  25. Eurostat (Statistical office of the European Union). 2016. Urban Europe Statistics on Cities, Towns and Suburbs. Luxembourg: Eurostat.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Eurostat online (Statistical Office of the European Union). 2019. “Methodology”. Accessed June 24 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/rural-development/methodology

  27. Franzen, Nathalie, Ulf Hahne, Andrea Hartz, Olaf Kühne, Franz Schafranski, Annette Spellerberg, and Holger Zeck. 2008. Herausforderung Vielfalt – Ländliche Räume im Struktur- und Politikwandel [Diversity Challenge—Rural Areas in Structural and Political Change]. Hannover: Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung. https://shop.arl-net.de/media/direct/pdf/e-paper_der_arl_nr4.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gemeinde Baiersbronn. 2019. “Zahlen, Daten, Fakten.” Accessed 24 June 2019. https://www.gemeinde-baiersbronn.de/index.shtml?gb_zahlen

  29. Gemeinde Leiferde. 2019. “Leiferde.” Accessed 24 June 2019. http://www.leiferde.de/

  30. Gehl, Jan. 1987. Life between Buildings: Using Public Space. New York: Van Nostrand Rheinhold Company.

    Google Scholar 

  31. He, Yong, and Xiaoping Xie. 2017. Living in China: A Survey of Changes in China’s Family Dwellings since 1949 [Juzhu zai Zhongguo: 1949 nian yilai zhongguo jiating juzhu bianqian shilu]. Nanjing: Southeast University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. I-KU (Institute for the Development of Rural Cultural Area). 2019. “Institut zur Entwicklung des ländlichen Kulturraums.” Accessed June 24 2019. https://www.i-ku.net/

  33. Jacobs, Jane. 1962. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. London: John Dickens and Conner Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Koolhaas, Rem. 2014. “Countryside Architecture.” Accessed 24 June 2019. https://www.iconeye.com/architecture/features/item/11031-rem-koolhaas-in-the-country

  35. Krüger, Tobias, Martin Schorcht, Martin Behnisch, and Gotthard Meinel. 2017. “Aktuelle Befunde des IÖR-Monitors zur Flächenneuinanspruchnahme in Deutschland.” [Current Findings of the IÖR Monitor for New Land Use in Germany] In Flächennutzungsmonitoring IX: Nachhaltigkeit der Siedlungsund Verkehrsentwicklung? IÖR-Schriften [Land Use Monitoring IX: Sustainability of Settlement and Traffic Development? IÖR Fonts], edited by G. Meinel, U. Schumacher, S. Schwarz, and B. Richter, 11–20. Berlin: Rhombos.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Küpper, Patrick. 2016. “Abgrenzung und Typisierung ländlicher Räume.” Thünen Working Paper 68, Braunschweig, Germany. Accessed 24 June 2019. https://literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/dn057783.pdf

  37. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 1994. Creating Rural Indicators for Shaping Territorial Policy. Pairs: OECD Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Penke, Swantje. 2012. “Ländliche Räume und Strukturen—mehr als eine ‘Restkategorie’ mit Defiziten.” [Rural Areas and Structures—More than a ‘Residual Category’ with Deficits.] In Soziale Arbeit in ländlichen Räumen Debiel [Social Work in Rural Areas Debiel], edited by S. Engel, A. Hermann-Stietz, I. Litges, G. Penke, S. and L. Wagner, 17–27. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pollak, Sabine, ed. 2011. Die Freuden des Landlebens. Zur Zukunft des ruralen Wohnens [The Joys of Country life. The Future of Rural Living]. Vienna: Sonderzahl.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Spars, Guido. 2005. Flächenneuinanspruchnahme in schrumpfenden und wachsenden Städten und Regionen. Gibt es plausible Erklärungszusammenhänge? [Land Reclamation in Shrinking and Growing Cities and Regions. Are There Plausible Explanatory Connections?] In Das Flächensparbuch. Diskussionen zu Flächenverbrauch und lokalem Bodenbewusstsein [The Land Saving Book. Discussions on Land Use and Local Soil Awareness], edited by A. Besecke, R. Hänsch, and M. Pinetzki, 55–62. Berlin: ISR Diskussionsbeiträge.

    Google Scholar 

  41. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2018. “National Human Development Report 2018: Planning the Opportunities for a Youthful Population.” Accessed 24 June 2019. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/2843/978-92-1-126436-4_web.pdf

  42. Whyte, William. H. (1956) 2002. The Organization Man. Reprint. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Whyte, William. H. 1980. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. New York: Project for Public Spaces Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoping Xie.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, X., Krüger, T. The Promotion of Building Culture in Rural Germany. Built Heritage 3, 37–49 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03545726

Download citation

Keywords

  • building culture
  • Baukultur
  • rural Germany
  • institutional promotion
  • rural revitalisation
  • civil society initiative