Skip to main content

The Political Heritage of Textile Districts: Shanghai and Mumbai

Abstract

This article examines the evolution of mill districts in Shanghai and Mumbai across the 20th century as cases of political heritage—in which the socio-spatial formations of factory and neighbourhood produced new meanings of citizenship for the workers in each city. Using historical materials from the textile industry in each city, government reports, housing data, and secondary sources, this article first traces the origins of Shanghai’s textile industry in the 19th century to its connections with Bombay’s textile mills, then examines the emergence of working-class neighbourhoods as they acquired distinctive patterns of tenement housing, shopfronts, and street life. The main finding is that despite clear differences in the two cities in terms of religion, culture, and politics, the ‘mill district’ became a socio-cultural formation central to the identity and memory of generations of textile workers in Shanghai and Mumbai. A concluding section examines the similar process in each city in the 21st century in which mill compounds and neighbourhoods were converted into high-end commercial real estate and sites for consumption and leisure.

References

  1. Adarkar, Neera, and Meena Menon. 2004. One Hundred Years, One Hundred Voices: The Millworkers of Girangaon: An Oral History. Calcutta: Seagull Books.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chalana, Manish. 2012. “Of Mills and Malls: The Future of Urban Industrial Heritage in Neoliberal Mumbai.” Future Anterior 9 (1): 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chandavarkar, Rajnarayan. 1994. The Origins of Industrial Capitalism in India: Business Strategies and the Working Classes in Bombay, 1900–1940. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chandavarkar, Rajnarayan. 2009. History, Culture and the Indian City: Essays by Rajnarayan Chandavarkar. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, Yingfang. 2007. “Kongjian yu shehui: zuowei shehui zhuyi shixian de chengshi gaizao: Shanghai penghuqu di shilie, 1949–1979” [Space and Society: Urban Transformation as Socialist Practice: The Case of Shanghai’s Slum Settlements, 1949–1979.] Paper presented at “Urban Flows-Rural Moves” Cultural Studies Research Conference, Taipei, January 6–7.

  6. Chen, Zhilong. 2017. “Shanghai: A Window for Studying Sino-Indian Relations in the Era of Colonialism and Imperialism.” In India and China in the Colonial World, edited by Madhavi Thampi, 33–54. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dossal, Mariam. 2010. Theater of Conflict, City of Hope: Mumbai 1660 to Present Times. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Farrer, James. 2019. “Grimy Heritage: Organic Bar Streets in Shanghai and Tokyo.” Built Heritage 3 (3): 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Frazier, Mark W. 2018. “The Origins of State Capacity: Workers and Officials in Mid-20th Century Shanghai and Bombay.” In Beyond Regimes: China and India Compared, edited by Prasenjit Duara and Elizabeth J. Perry, 33–54. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Frazier, Mark W. 2019. The Power of Place: Contentious Politics in Twentieth Century Shanghai and Bombay. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harvey, David. 2008. “The Right to the City.” New Left Review, no. 53: 23–40.

  12. Hazareesingh, Sandip. 2007. The Colonial City and the Challenge of Modernity: Urban Hegemonies and Civic Contestations in Bombay City, 1900–1925. Hyderabad: Orient Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Holston, James. 2008. Insurgent Citizenship: Disjunctions of Democracy and Modernity in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Honig, Emily. 1986. Sisters and Strangers: Women in the Shanghai Cotton Mills, 1919–1949. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Luo, Suwen. 2011. Gaolangqiao jishi: jindai Shanghai yige mianfangzhi gongye qu de xingqi yu zhongjie [Records of Gaolangqiao: The Rise and the End of a Textile District in Modern Shanghai]. Shanghai: Shanghai renmin chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mahadevia, Darshini, and Harini Narayanan. 2008. “Shanghaing Mumbai: Politics of Evictions and Resistance in Slum Settlements.” In Inside the Transforming Urban Asia: Processes, Policies, and Public Actions, edited by Darshini Mahadevia, 549–589. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  17. McKinsey & Company. 2003. “Vision Mumbai: Transforming Mumbai into a World-class City: A Summary of Recommendations.” Mumbai: Bombay First and McKinsey & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Morris, David Morris. 1965. The Emergence of an Industrial Labor Force in India: A Study of the Bombay Cotton Mills, 1854–1947. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Newman, Richard. 1981. Workers and Unions in Bombay, 1918–1929: A Study of Organization in the Cotton Mills. Canberra: Australian National University Monographs on South Asia.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pearse, Arno S. 1929. The Cotton Industry of Japan and China. Manchester, England: International Federation of Master Cotton Spinners’ and Manufacturers’ Association.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Perry, Elizabeth J. 1993. Shanghai on Strike: The Politics of Chinese Labor. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rutnagur, S. M. 1927. Bombay Industries: The Cotton Mills. Bombay: Indian Textile Journal, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Smith, Neil. 2008. “On the Eviction of Critical Perspectives.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 (1): 195–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Smith, S.A. 2002. Like Cattle and Horses: Nationalism and Labor in Shanghai, 1895–1927. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Srivastava, Siddharth. 2005. “Mumbai Struggles to Catch Up with Shanghai.” Asia Times Online (March 16).

  26. Upadhyay, Shashi Bhushan. 2004. Existence, Identity, and Mobilization: The Cotton Millworkers of Bombay, 1890–1919. New Delhi: Manohar Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark W. Frazier.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frazier, M.W. The Political Heritage of Textile Districts: Shanghai and Mumbai. Built Heritage 3, 62–75 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03545744

Download citation

Keywords

  • industrial heritage
  • political heritage textile industry
  • urban housing
  • citizenship
  • Mumbai history
  • Shanghai history