Skip to main content

PAX—Patios de la Axerquía Urban Regeneration and Social Innovation in a Heritage Context

Abstract

Following a decades-long real estate bubble involving a culture of indiscriminate ownership and occupation of land, PAX—Patios de la Axerquía is proposing an innovative system of governance in the city of Córdoba in Spain that fosters a new urban model consistent with the aims of the New Urban Agenda and a Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive City: from a culture of speculation to one of rehabilitation. A system of multilevel co-management between the public administration and the social economy provides the basis for the acquisition and cooperative use of empty houses as a model of urban regeneration through social innovation in a heritage context. The rehabilitation of the patio-houses in Axerquía, which have been threatened by gentrification, aims to restore the environmental values of the Mediterranean city and upgrade its historical characteristics in a contemporary way together with the citizenship: from its architectural value as a World Heritage site to its anthropological value as Intangible Heritage of Humanity, as recognised by UNESCO in 2012. The interaction between innovative mechanisms of sustainable urban development opens up a pathway of virtuous policies for the densification of the existing city by the local population, generation of micro-employment, and support for collective projects that incorporate refugees and migrants in a system of solidarity. Updating the urban, environmental, social, and economic values of the traditional city is a step toward understanding the Mediterranean city as an undeniable reminder of our past and, at the same time, providing an essential tool for the future development of a smart, sustainable, and inclusive Europe.

References

  1. Annunziata, Sandra, ed. 2017. Anti-gentrificación nelle città (sud) europee [Anti-gentrification in (Southern) European Cities]. Urbanistica Tre 5 (13).

  2. Battistella, Alessio. 2017. “The Sustainable Lightness of the Limit.” Techne—Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment 14 (2): 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Council of Europe. 1985. “Convention for the Protection of the Architectural Heritage of Europe.”

  4. Franzoia, Elena. 2016. “Cordova riscopre il patio mediterráneo.” Abitare 558: 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harvey, David. 2012. La ciudad rebelde. Del derecho a la ciudad a la revolución urbana [The Rebellious City: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution]. Madrid: Akal.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Indovina, F., and O. Nel.lo. 2015. “Gentrificación: Desastre, necesidad, oportunidad?. Notas para un uso crítico del concepto.” [Gentrification: Disaster, need, opportunity ? Notes for a Critical Use of the Concept.] In Capitalisme global i procesos de regeneración urbana [Global Capitalism and Urban Regeneration Processes]. Homenatge a Neil Smith. Col.loqui internacional, Espai critic, 14–16 September 2015, Barcelona.

  7. Lees, Loretta, Bang Shin Hyun, and Ernesto López Morales. 2016. Planetary Gentrification. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lees, Loretta, Tom Slater, and Elvin Wyly. 2010. The Gentrification Reader. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lefebvre, Henri. 1975. El derecho a la ciudad [The Right to the City]. Barcelona: Penìnsula.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nel.lo O. 2015. La ciudad en movimiento. Crisis social y respuesta ciudadana [The City in Movement: Social Crisis and Citizen Response]. Madrid: Diaz & Pons

    Google Scholar 

  11. Observatorio Metropolitano de Madrid, ed. 2015. El mercado contra la ciudad. Globalización, gentrificación y polìticas urbanas [The Market against the City: Globalization, Gentrification and Urban Policies]. Madrid: Traficante de sueños.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Redaelli, Gaia. 2018. “Atlas de la A-Gentrificación. Políticas y medidas para la sostenibilidad social en las transformaciones urbanas en ciudades europeas.” [Atlas of A-Gentrification. Policies and Measures for Social Sustainability in Urban Transformations in European Cities.] Papers 60. Barcelona: Instituto de Estudi Metropolitans i Regionals de Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rojas-Fernández Juan, Carmen Galán-Marín, Jorge Roa-Fernández and Carlos Rivera-Gómez C. 2017. “Correlations between GIS-Based Urban Building Densification Analysis and Climate Guidelines for Mediterranean Courtyards.” Sustainability 9 (12).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Saviani, Benjamim. 2018. “Restoration as a Social Cohesión Instrument: Vila Itororó in Central São Paulo.” Built Heritage 2 (1): 66–76.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Secchi, Bernardo. 2013. La città dei ricchi e la città dei poveri [The City of the Rich and the City of the Poor]. Roma-Bari: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Settis, Salvatore. 2014. Se Venezia muore [If Venice Dies]. Torino: Einaudi.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Smith, Neil. 2002. “New Globalism, New Urbanism: Gentrification as Global Urban Strategy.” Antipode 34 (3): 434–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Synnes, K., Artopoulos G., Smaniotto C., Menezes M., and Redaelli G. 2019. “CyberParks Songs and Stories— Enriching Public Spaces with Localized Culture Heritage Material such as Digitized Songs and Stories.” In CyberParks—The Interface Between People, Places and Technology:New Approaches and Perspectives, edited by Carlos Smaniotto Costa, 224–237. Springer.

  19. UNESCO. 2003. “Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage.”

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaia Redaelli.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Redaelli, G. PAX—Patios de la Axerquía Urban Regeneration and Social Innovation in a Heritage Context. Built Heritage 3, 91–104 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03545738

Download citation

Keywords

  • urban rehabilitation
  • social innovation
  • gentrification
  • heritage
  • cooperative processes
  • Housing cooperatives